By Sheldon Cooper
On September 29th I became a father. As I make the adjustment to thinking of myself as “papa”, I realize that my location in our family tree has fundamentally changed. Once the outermost leaf, I have become a limb. My job now includes supporting new growth of the next generation of my family.
This is, of course, as common as rain. It is built into the natural order of things: to receive and give support, to be part of a continuum, to live constantly holding hands with the past and future. This is what being part of a family means, and by extension, to be part of a community.
Recently, two new reports came across my desk that touch on this topic through the lens of affordable homeownership. In Retention or Recapture: A Comparison of Two Seattle First-Time Homebuyer Subsidy Programs, Heather Burns details the balance of community and individual wealth creation promoted by Homestead CLT and the City of Seattle Office of Housing downpayment assistance program. In this analysis, Burns shows that the Office of Housing approach allows individual homebuyers to capture three times the gain of Homestead buyers at resale. This individual gain comes at a cost to future generations, because for the second generation, Homestead can assist 22 families into homeownership for the same cost as assisting one second generation family served through the Office of Housing loan program. The Office of Housing’s program privileges individual wealth creation for this generation (at internal rates of return for subsidized homeowners above what unsubsidized homeowners can expect) far above preserving the same opportunity for future generations.
The Seattle Office of Housing’s approach is standard across the country, as the fall issue of Shelterforce details in Tim McKenzie’s The Case for Plan B. Here McKenzie calls for jurisdictions to shift from the historically favored “Plan A” and create permanently affordable homes (not temporarily affordable homes via affordable payment schemes.) A shift to Plan B would require that jurisdictions directly face the issue of how much individual wealth building is appropriate and consciously limit equity in order to create permanent affordability.
Burns’ study shows a hypothetical HCLT homeowner building approximately $100K through our limited equity resale formula over 10 years, while an Office of Housing buyer gains over $300K during the same time. Is the $100K profit too little? Is the $300K profit a windfall? How do we balance today’s equity building against the cost to future tax payers to provide homeownership opportunities to future generations of modest income residents? It is time for Seattle to ask and find answers to these fundamental policy questions, so that we can begin to build a stock of homes that everyone can afford, from generation to generation.
Homestead has always consciously and carefully limited the equity of this generation of our homeowners, so that the opportunity to become homeowners is preserved for future generations. Homes are about more than wealth creation. Family security, a stakeholding place in the community, legacy, - these benefits go beyond the bottom line at resale.
As my mother beamed when seeing her granddaughter, what comes around goes around. That is how family and community are strengthened.









